Identity clarity
Recurring AI/not-human disclosure and resistance to identity ambiguity.
A United States heat map of policy signals that shape non-clinical caregiving AI: companion chatbots, mental-health chatbots, AI therapy boundaries, consumer health data, healthcare AI disclosure, and high-risk AI governance.
Caregiving AI sits between ordinary chatbot law, health-data rules, companion safety, and therapy regulation. The map makes that split visible so the case for a national caregiving AI standard is concrete.
InvisibleBench relationship-risk context18
12
6
38
Hover a state for the quick read. Click or focus a state to keep the full source list in the detail panel.
50 states plus DC; federal context below.
Official source preferred; tracker items are labeled.
Research map only. Not legal advice.
State bills are converging on disclosure, minors, self-harm, therapy boundaries, and sensitive data. Caregiving AI needs those controls plus longitudinal relationship safety under family stress, class constraints, and real care decisions.
Recurring AI/not-human disclosure and resistance to identity ambiguity.
Self-harm detection, crisis referrals, escalation protocol, and public reporting.
Controls for dependency cues, manipulative engagement, minors, and simulated intimacy.
Consumer health data limits, health AI transparency, impact assessment, and human review.
Federal signals are split across chatbot/minor bills, health IT transparency, HIPAA cybersecurity, and sensitive data rules. That fragmentation is the policy argument for a national caregiving AI standard.
Federal proposal targeting companion AI chatbots used by minors, including restrictions on access and harmful dialogue.
Federal proposal defining AI companions and focusing on minors, non-human disclosure, age verification, and sexual-content harms.
Federal proposal including chatbot crisis-resource disclosures and a four-year longitudinal study of chatbot mental-health risks and benefits for minors.
Final rule updates health IT certification and includes algorithm transparency requirements for certified health IT.
Proposed federal rule to strengthen cybersecurity requirements for electronic protected health information.
Final rule restricting certain transactions involving U.S. sensitive personal data and government-related data with countries of concern.
36 raw civic signals were fetched on 2026-05-20T04:01:09Z. Raw results are treated as discovery, then normalized before publication.
Published entries prefer state legislature, agency, Federal Register, Congress.gov, or official bill text. Tracker sources are marked where the official source is still being resolved.
The map is about non-clinical caregiving AI. Clinical, therapeutic, and health-data rules are included when they shape expectations for support systems used by vulnerable people over time.
This is designed as a monitored policy layer. New civic sweeps should feed a review queue before the public map changes tier or status.
Proposed direct bills are kept visible even before enactment because they show where states are defining the risk perimeter.
Pennsylvania proposals cover chatbot disclosures and minor-focused AI chatbot safeguards.
New Jersey has proposed legislation focused on therapeutic chatbots and social AI companions.
Kansas has 2026 companion AI chatbot legislation in the proposal layer.
Virginia proposed an Artificial Intelligence Companion Chatbots and Minors Act in 2026.
North Carolina has a tracked 2026 AI chatbot proposal in the public review layer.
Hawaii introduced AI disclosure legislation tracked as adjacent to chatbot transparency.
Florida has 2026 companion chatbot legislation focused on platform notice, age verification, protocols, and civil actions.